GurjasEvidence & Policy Analytics
Free Tool

APC Invoice Triage

Received an article-processing-charge invoice that feels off? Answer a short questionnaire about it. The tool returns a discrepancy register — each answer marked Consistent, Discrepancy, Common fraud pattern or Not answered, with one factual sentence each. It does not decide whether the invoice is genuine or whether you should pay it.

Invoice questionnaire

Optional

Compare against a recorded APC

If you enter the journal name or ISSN and press the button, its name or ISSN is sent from your browser directly to OpenAlex to look up a recorded fee. This step is optional and separate from building the register below.

Did the invoice arrive after formal editorial acceptance?
Does the invoice's payee name match the journal's registered publisher?

Method and limitations

Method version 1.0 · reviewed 20 July 2026. Four of your answers are checked against documented fraud patterns and simple factual comparisons (payment method, acceptance timing, payee-name match, domain match); a fifth, optional comparison checks your quoted amount against a fee OpenAlex records for the journal, if you look one up. Each check reports Consistent, Discrepancy, Common fraud pattern or Not answered with one sentence — never a combined score, percentage or overall verdict.

Not checked: whether the journal itself is legitimate (use the Journal Evidence Checker for that), the invoice's authenticity as a document, or anything about the underlying manuscript. An invoice preceding acceptance is treated as a fraud-pattern signal, but some fully open-access publishers legitimately disclose an upfront submission fee as stated policy — confirm this against the journal's own terms before relying on this signal alone. All answers stay in your browser; only an optional journal name/ISSN (for the APC lookup) is ever sent anywhere, and only to OpenAlex.