Open third-party evidence
The cited DOI, repository or profile is publicly accessible outside gurjas.org. Platform coverage and update timing still apply.
This ledger names the source, snapshot date, verification method and limitation behind Gurjas's headline claims. The companion tool contracts disclose what every research tool sends, calculates and cannot decide.
A public third-party record is stronger than a dated owner export; a Gurjas-maintained count is different again. The register preserves those distinctions.
The cited DOI, repository or profile is publicly accessible outside gurjas.org. Platform coverage and update timing still apply.
The value was transcribed from an account-holder export and linked to the public profile where possible. It may not be fully reproducible without login.
The value is counted from a dated Gurjas register or production inventory. It is disclosed as first-party evidence, not independent attestation.
Machine-readable records: claim ledger JSON · tool-contract JSON. These files are versioned with the site and checked during every production build.
Values below are bound to the site's central fact file. The build fails if the public ledger and production facts drift apart.
10 journal articles · 4 book chapters
Counted from the dated publications register. The total is maintained by Gurjas; use the item-level DOI and publisher links for independent checks.
204 citations · h-index 8 · i10-index 8
Transcribed from an owner export and cross-linked to the public profile ↗. Coverage and calculations are controlled by Google Scholar and change continuously.
14 papers · 6,886 views · 1,300 downloads · top 3.2%
Transcribed from an authenticated My Papers export and linked to the author page ↗. Some values may require login to reproduce.
63 review records · 56 manuscripts
Transcribed from an owner-supplied export and linked to the Web of Science profile ↗. Confidentiality prevents item-level public disclosure.
101,528 adults · 97 economies · 2021–2024
Checked against the DOI-resolved Zenodo record ↗. A public deposit improves reproducibility; it does not independently validate every analytical decision.
36 jurisdictions · 34 analysed · 4 pillars · 3 weighting schemes
Checked against the DOI-resolved Zenodo record ↗. The 0.89–0.94 range is rank agreement across specifications, not a confidence interval.
9 production routes · no sign-up
Matched one-to-one against the tool-contract registry. Availability does not establish fitness for a particular decision; use the boundaries below.
The complete JSON contract also records processing location, outbound request payloads, named sources, outputs and non-checked facts.
Does not validate evidence or calculate readiness, risk probability, ethics approval or likely success.
Does not determine submission eligibility or override a university ordinance. Dates beyond the national minimum and maximum are planning milestones.
Does not perform a model-specific power analysis or establish a universally sufficient sample size.
Does not establish that an instrument is valid, unidimensional or suitable for a particular study.
Does not decide whether a journal is legitimate or safe to submit to; no composite probability or verdict is calculated.
Does not endorse a journal or predict scope fit, quality, acceptance or current indexing.
Does not validate an invoice, establish legitimacy or determine whether a user should pay.
Does not reproduce current BAF/MBGL scoring, calculate an accreditation percentage or predict a grade.
Does not promise call availability, establish applicant eligibility or replace the official announcement and portal.
Found a mismatch? Send the claim or tool name, the source you checked and the date to [email protected]. Corrections are reviewed against the cited record before publication.