Your stack, not ours
We work in R, Python, Stata, SPSS/AMOS and SmartPLS, and deliver in the package your team already uses. If your researchers are committed to R, the entire engagement — code, outputs, replication files — is delivered in R.
Capabilities
Four priority offers. One standard of proof.
Start with the buyer-specific outcome you need. Each priority offer makes fit, deliverables, inputs, timing, indicative investment and ethical boundaries visible before scoping.
Choose the decision at risk
Dedicated pathways for high-trust work
Each page includes a fixed-scope first step and one clear action.
Universities · research offices
Institutional Research Integrity
Review governance, publication controls, authorship, AI use, data handling and corrections.
Diagnostic · 1–3 weeks · starts at ₹1,00,000→ Higher education · IQACNAAC/IQAC Evidence Readiness
Build criterion-wise traceability and resolve material evidence gaps before submission pressure.
Diagnostic · 1–3 weeks · ₹1,00,000–₹2,50,000→ NGO · CSR · policy programmesImpact Evaluation and Analytics
Design and analyse evaluations that distinguish evidence, inference and limitation.
Diagnostic · 1–3 weeks · engagements ₹75,000–₹4,00,000→ Faculty · researchers · scholarsAdvanced Research Methods
Align questions, constructs, data, sampling and models before avoidable rework.
Review · 1–3 weeks · research design ₹15,000–₹1,00,000→Ranges are indicative, not fixed quotes. Each offer page states the included work, required inputs, exclusions and fuller pricing logic; the exact fee and timeline are fixed in a written scope.
Published open evidence
From analytical architecture to decision-ready evidence.
Two reproducible research assets show the scale, provenance and analytical pathways behind our impact-analytics work. Every figure below links to its public deposit.
Open dataset · Version 1.0 · CC BY 4.0
Global Findex resilience analysis
Individual- and country-level conversion measures built from named official sources, with a complete Python pipeline for multilevel, panel, heterogeneity and configurational analysis.
- Adults
- 101,528
- Economies
- 97
- Panel
- 2021–2024
Open index · Version 0.1 · CC BY 4.0
AUCR DPI–Inclusion Conversion Index
A reproducible framework measuring how Indian states and union territories convert financial access into use, capability and resilience across three weighting schemes.
- States/UTs
- 36
- Analytical sample
- 34
- Scheme agreement
- 0.89–0.94
Evidence label: published, independently accessible research assets. Dataset scale and analytical design are factual; no programme outcome or client result is implied.
Working practices
The questions serious teams ask first
Software, timelines, ethics approvals and the use of AI — answered upfront, so nothing surfaces mid-engagement.
Your deadline sets the clock
Scoping starts by understanding your timeline, then we respond with what is realistically achievable. As a guide: enquiries answered within two working days; a methodology consult typically runs 1–3 weeks; a full evaluation 6–12 weeks. Indicative only — the agreed timeline is fixed in the written scope.
Approvals before fieldwork
For studies involving primary data from human participants, we ask about institutional ethics / IRB approval at scoping — and can support preparing the application. Where approval is required, fieldwork does not begin without it.
Human-led, disclosed, never substitutive
AI tools may assist with bounded tasks — literature scanning, code drafting and editing, formatting. They never generate findings, analysis, citations or academic text for a client to submit as their own; every substantive output is produced and verified by the team, and client data is never entered into public AI systems. See our full AI transparency statement.
How engagements run
Five stages, no surprises
A controlled commercial pathway from first diagnostic to final handover. Select a stage to see what enters, what is agreed and what leaves it.
- DiagnosticAssess · diagnose
- ScopeDefine · bound
- AgreementConfirm · protect
- DeliveryExecute · review
- ReviewHandover · close
Stage 01 · Diagnostic
Establish the real starting point.
A structured, creditable review of where the engagement actually stands before a solution is proposed.
- Input
- Available materials, deadline and decision context
- Decision control
- Gaps, dependencies and material risks
- Output
- A credible starting-point review
Stage 02 · Scope
Turn the priority into a bounded brief.
The diagnostic is translated into written objectives, deliverables, timing and fee before substantive work begins.
- Input
- Diagnostic findings and the agreed priority
- Decision control
- Objectives, boundaries, assumptions and exclusions
- Output
- Written deliverables, timeline and fee
Stage 03 · Agreement
Make responsibilities explicit.
The accepted scope becomes a formal engagement with responsibilities, confidentiality and commercial milestones recorded.
- Input
- Accepted scope and authorised representatives
- Decision control
- Responsibilities, confidentiality and milestones
- Output
- Agreement and billing schedule
Stage 04 · Delivery
Work through documented review gates.
Delivery is staged so methods, evidence and emerging outputs can be examined at agreed points—not only at the end.
- Input
- Agreed data, materials and access
- Decision control
- Documented method and scheduled review points
- Output
- Staged, defensible deliverables
Stage 05 · Review
Close with an intelligible handover.
A final walkthrough records limitations, resolves handover questions and closes the information lifecycle responsibly.
- Input
- Final outputs and supporting materials
- Decision control
- Walkthrough, limitations and acceptance
- Output
- Handover plus confidential archive or return
These five stages govern the commercial side of an engagement; the research itself follows the four-phase engagement process described on our homepage. Common questions about pricing logic, authorship and turnaround are answered plainly on the FAQ page.
Get started
Start with a clear research problem.
Use our structured intake form — objective, data status, timeline and expected output — and we respond with a suitable scope, process and next steps, usually within two working days.
Connected evidence
Continue through the evidence system.
These links are editorially mapped to this page so you can move between methods, research, tools, outputs and public verification without returning to the main menu.