Institutional Evidence Readiness
A twenty-question evidence inventory organised around the legacy RAF seven-criteria structure. It identifies records to verify; it does not calculate a NAAC accreditation score.
Framework status
Legacy RAF evidence structure · method version 1.1 · reviewed 20 July 2026. This independent diagnostic is not issued, approved or endorsed by NAAC. It does not reproduce BAF/MBGL scoring and must not be used to predict an accreditation outcome.
Before acting, verify the currently operative framework and manuals at the official NAAC manuals page ↗ and your institution's applicable notices.
Criterion-wise evidence status
Review summary: —
Top remediation priorities
A “present” answer is a self-report, not verification. A defensible institutional review must test whether evidence is current, source-owned, reconciled across systems and traceable to the underlying record. Verify current NAAC requirements at the official source. For an on-ground data-validation audit and remediation plan, write to us.
How to read this tool
Purpose: Inventory present, partial and missing institutional records across the legacy RAF seven-criteria structure.
- Maturity
- Production
- Method version
- 1.1
- Reviewed
- Processing
- Local browser only
Evidence basis
- NAAC manualsofficial source; current framework must be confirmed
Privacy
Answers remain in the user's browser.
Limitations
The questions use a legacy RAF evidence structure and do not reproduce BAF/MBGL scoring. Answers are self-reported, not verified evidence.
Decision boundary
No accreditation percentage, grade prediction or official readiness score is calculated.