Research integrity and evidence systems
Publication-risk reviews, research-office workflows, faculty methodology support, evidence readiness and responsible AI governance.
Institutional pathways
Start with the evidence gap—not the sector label.
Universities, NGOs, CSR teams, government units and foundations often need the same underlying capabilities: evidence architecture, measurement, integrity, synthesis and decision-ready reporting.
Journal and publication verification
Source-linked journal assessment, publication-list audits, librarian-facing checklists and institutional guidance.
Monitoring, evaluation and learning
Theory of change, indicator design, baseline/endline strategy, contribution analysis and evidence-use systems.
Independent impact evidence
Evaluation design, field protocols, outcome measurement, social-return reasoning and board-ready reporting without inflated attribution claims.
Evidence synthesis and decision support
Rapid evidence reviews, policy appraisal, programme diagnostics, implementation evidence and concise decision briefs.
Evaluation and learning architecture
Evaluability assessment, grant-level indicators, portfolio learning questions and proportionate evidence standards.
A disciplined first step
Bring the decision, available evidence, deadline and review audience.
Gurjas can then determine whether the need is a short diagnostic, a methods review, an evaluation design, an evidence synthesis or a larger engagement. No generic package is assumed.
Start an institutional enquiry