A focused 75–90-minute session that turns research-integrity principles into practical checks, responsibilities and next actions for the people who manage, support and conduct research.
Request an institutional clinic →Integrity failures often begin in routine decisions: selecting a journal, assigning authorship, using generative AI, storing data, correcting an error or escalating a concern. The clinic makes those decision points visible and discussable.
It does not presume misconduct, demand confidential case disclosure or present a generic policy as institutional implementation.
The final emphasis is agreed with the host before delivery.
Journal and reference verification: indexing claims, cloned sites, DOI checks, APC and invoice discrepancies.
Authorship and responsible AI use: contribution records, disclosure, human accountability and prohibited shortcuts.
Data and evidence handling: provenance, secure transfer, reproducible records, retention and access boundaries.
Corrections and escalation: documenting errors, assigning responsibility and routing concerns without concealment.
Agree the audience, priority decisions, format, boundaries and materials before the session.
Work through evidence-led examples and verification routines without exposing confidential cases.
Participants complete a structured self-assessment and identify unresolved discrepancies.
Close with an action register and, where useful, a separately scoped institution-specific diagnostic.
No. It is an educational and diagnostic session. It does not certify compliance, provide legal assurance or determine misconduct.
Yes. Online delivery is available. In-person delivery can be discussed where audience, venue, travel, accessibility and safeguarding requirements are clear.
Yes. The session can be adapted for a defined member audience, provided the public description accurately identifies Gurjas as the clinic provider and does not imply endorsement beyond the host’s written approval.
Yes. A separate diagnostic can be scoped where the institution wants its policies, workflows, records and responsibilities reviewed against visible evidence.
Gurjas will respond with fit, required inputs, boundaries and a written scope. No institutional association is announced without written permission.
